自然科学版 英文版
自然科学版 英文版
自然科学版 英文版
 

中南大学学报(社会科学版)
ZHONGNAN DAXUE XUEBAO(SHEHUI KEXUE BAN)

2015年04月第21卷第2期
   
本文已被:浏览942次    下载798次   在线阅读256
文章编号:1672-3104(2015)02-0080-06
 
地役权的功能泛化与本质复归
 
雷秋玉
 
(昆明理工大学法学院,云南昆明,650500)
 
摘  要: 地役权概念被滥用是当今学术环境下法律概念被滥用的典型之一。地役权概念实际上是一个具有地方性的法律概念,有其确定的法教义学意义并应恪守作为私法权利的规范意旨。不宜将基于比较法研究发现的、局部特征类似于地役权的多种异质规则全部归结于地役权范畴,从而使得这一私法概念膨胀为横跨公私法的万能法律工具。当前较为迫切的学术任务,是给地役权瘦身,尤其是要清除“公共地役权”这一似是而非的学术概念造成的地役权虚胖现象,让地役权回归其本质。
 
关键字: 地役权;地方性;相邻关系;公共地役权;意义回归
 
 
Regressing from functional generalization of easement to its original nature
 
LEI Qiuyu
 
(Law School, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)
 
Abstract: The concept abuse of easement is a typical example that legal concept is being abused in contemporary academic environment. Essentially, the concept of easement is a legal concept with native nature and certain meanings on legal dogmatics, which should strictly adhere to the purpose of right of private law itself. Nobody should do anything, for example, to incorporate heterogeneous rules with similar characteristic into easement category found in study of comparative law, so as to expand the concept of private law into a versatile legal instrument across public law and private law. Nowadays, it is an urgent academic mission to reduce its content, especially to clear bad effects caused by the specious academic concept “public easement”, and to enable easement to regress to its original way.
 
Key words: easement; native nature; neighboring relations; public easement; meanings regression
 
 
版权所有:《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部 
地 址:湖南省长沙市岳麓区麓山南路932号     邮编: 410083
电 话: 0731-88830141
电子邮箱: znsk@csu.edu.cn 湘ICP备09001153号